Skip to content
Capo & Cable
Methodology

How we research, and what we refuse to claim

Every site in this category will tell you it tested twenty tuners. We have not played any of them, and we say so. Here is exactly what we did instead.

Last updated 2026-09-01

The stance

Capo & Cable launched in September 2026. It has no test bench, no lab, no drawer of manufacturer samples and no credentialed staff. A site in that position has two options: pretend otherwise, or compete on something it can actually do.

We compete on published evidence. Every figure on this site comes from a page we read, and every one of them is cited so you can read it too. Where a company publishes nothing for a specification that matters, we print a row saying so rather than quietly leaving the row out.

That last point is the whole difference. A comparison table that drops the rows a product cannot fill is a table that flatters it.

The numbers this site is built on

Current, generated from the content registry at build time

Articles published41
Products covered54
Specification rows compiled and cited187
Rows where the maker publishes nothing22
Products carrying a 'skip this' section54 of 54
Products we claim to have played0
Free products accepted from a manufacturer0
Paid placements sold0
Prices last verifiedNo live feed today

The last four are categories where zero is the good number. They are claims withheld, not gaps in a scoreboard.

What we actually do

  1. Compile published specifications. Manufacturer product pages, published specification sheets and instruction manuals. Every figure that appears on this site is recorded with the page it came from, and that page is linked in the Sources section of the article it appears in.
  2. Read the manuals. Battery type and runtime, clamp range, calibration range, tuning modes, warranty terms, finish compatibility. Manuals routinely contain figures the marketing page omits.
  3. Compare like for like. String tension in pounds, pick thickness in millimeters, action in millimeters, stand load in kilograms. Where two makers describe the same property in different terms, we say so rather than pretending the comparison is clean.
  4. Record what is not published. A row that reads "not published" means we checked the page cited and the figure was not there. It is a finding.
  5. Check the price today. Prices render only from a live data layer with a freshness gate of 48 hours. Past that, the price disappears and the page says "check price".
  6. Read what owners report, at volume. Where the owner consensus is consistent and strong — a clip that fatigues, a headphone output that disappoints — we report it as owner consensus, labeled as such, not as a measurement.
  7. Name a skip on every pick. Every product on this site carries a "skip this if" section. A roundup where everything is excellent has not made a decision.

What we do not do

  • We have not played, handled or owned these products. Not one of them. Any sentence on this site implying otherwise is an error and we want to hear about it.
  • We do not accept free products.
  • We do not accept paid placement. No manufacturer can buy a position in a ranking here.
  • We do not publish our scores as ratings in structured data. The scores you see on the page are editorial and are deliberately kept out of the machine-readable markup, because publishing an untested editorial score as a product rating would contradict the page it sits on.
  • We do not invent numbers. No estimated prices, no remembered specifications, no plausible-sounding figures filling a gap.

How the scores work

Every product carries an editorial score out of ten, built from four components: how easy it is for a beginner to use, build quality, how clearly the maker publishes its specifications, and value at its price band.

The third component is unusual and deliberate. A product whose maker publishes an accuracy figure, a battery runtime and a weight scores higher on that axis than one whose maker publishes an adjective. That is a judgment about the company's willingness to be held to its claims, and we think it belongs in a buying decision.

These scores are ours, they are visible on the page, and they never appear in structured data.

Who writes this

Scooter M.. An enthusiast who is genuinely into this. I read the manuals, compile the published specs, and check what a thing actually costs today. No lab coat, no test bench, and no drawer of tuners a manufacturer sent me.

No credential is claimed, because none is held. No tenure is claimed either — you will not find "long-time", "veteran" or "years of experience" anywhere on this site, because those would be claims we could not support.

How we make money

Amazon Associates, under the tracking tag capoandcable-20. When you buy through a link here we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Every outbound commercial link routes through our own /go/ resolver, carries rel="sponsored nofollow noopener", and is disclosed above the first link on every commercial page.

Full detail on the disclosure page.

How to correct us

If a figure here is wrong, tell us: info@capoandcable.com, or through the contact form.

When you are right, we change the page and date the change. We do not quietly edit and pretend the error never happened — the corrections policy is set out in the editorial policy.

The limits of this method, stated plainly

Published specifications tell you what a maker claims, not how something feels in your hands. They cannot tell you whether a pick suits your grip, whether a strap digs into your shoulder, or whether a clip will still hold in two years.

Where those things matter, we say what we can support and stop. That is a narrower promise than the rest of this category makes, and it is one we can actually keep.